Priceton.org

What follows was written in 2008, shortly after the publication of William Gairdner’s latest.  For some reason which I can’t now recall, I failed to post it.  But since Gairdner’s work is always relevant, and Priceton’s watchword is anachronism, here it is…

Oh, Oh Canada!  A Voice from the Conservative Resistance (BPS Books), 195 pages;

The Book of Absolutes:  A Critique of Relativism and a Defence of Universals (McGill-Queens University Press), 398 pages

(Both books are available at williamgairdner.com.)

William D. Gairdner, Ph. D., is usually described as a “best-selling Canadian conservative author”.  The phrase is arresting:  of the possible partial combinations of these four words, most are so improbable that the complete catena almost defies belief.   It is rare enough to be a best-selling writer in Canada (especially of non-fiction); no less rare to be a Canadian writer of conservative opinion; rarest of all to be a Canadian writer of conservative opinion whose books consistently make the best-seller lists. Continue reading “William Gairdner’s Book of Absolutes” →

Empedocles…

And Pythagoras…

The Triadic Circle of the Soul…

In the cosmogony of Empedocles, we encounter a conception of the world-process that is no less moral than that of Parmenides, while at the same incorporating much of the mystical monism of his Eleatic predecessor.

Empedocles, c. 490-430 B.C., was a citizen of Acragas, an important Greek colony in Sicily.  A tradition going back to the fourth century B.C. has it that he was a disciple of Pythagoras–plausible enough, if only because of the geographical proximity of Acragas to the Pythagorean community in Croton in southern Italy—and that he was rebuked by his fellow adherents for having revealed the secret teachings of the master in his writings.  The charge is substantiated by the many fragments that have come down to us; all the same, Empedocles was said to have been revered in his own right as a god, and to have inspired a cult following no less devoted than that of Pythagoras. Continue reading “The Vocabulary of Myth, Part XXXVI” →

Parmenides’ “Way of Opinion”…

Light and Night, and Heracleitus’ Opposites…

Parmenides’ Doomed Monism…

Light and Night as Religious Categories…

The Inseparability of Ontology and Morality…

In the prologue to his poem, Parmenides’ goddess-muse promised to reveal to him “all things; both the unshakable heart of well-rounded truth and the opinions of mortals to which there is no true belief”.  The first half of his task has now been accomplished; true being has been proven to be “complete on every side like the body of a well-rounded sphere”, that is, unchanging, indivisible, unitary, and self-contained. Continue reading “The Vocabulary of Myth, Part XXXV” →

As the recent election in the U.S. has reminded everyone, conservatives and liberals have always had, well, their differences.  A couple of years ago, the prolific political author William Gairdner attempted to define them in his book The Great Divide, concluding that conservatives and liberals are now so far apart that they had better just give up trying to talk to one another, and decamp to separate countries.  (Note to Bill:  they already have; look at the post-November 8 electoral map of the U.S.  Let’s hope that Trump establishes sanctuary cities in California and New York for Republicans.) Continue reading “Slouching Towards Mao” →

In our very first essay (“We Introduce Ourselves”), we promised that Priceton.org would be ever current, but never topical.  Thus, during the nearly two-year long U.S. presidential campaign, we at Priceton fastidiously resisted the urge to weigh in, in spite of the besetting temptation it posed on an almost daily basis to the satirical imagination.  But in our most recent post (“Fake News”), we may have jumped the gun.  After all, it has been only two months since the election campaign officially ended.  (And what mind is so capacious as to be able to make sense of, what stomach so robust as to be able to metabolize, after such a brief interval, the Olympian dung-heap of misinformation and lies excreted by the Democrat campaign and bespread by their propaganda agents in the progressive media?

As an antidote to our indecent haste, accordingly, we offer “Fake News From Long Ago”: factoids and story-lines about the history of the world ab initio to the modern era, that have been blithely repeated by historians (popular and academic), theologians, philosophers, scientists, university professors in every field, politicians, TV documentarians, movie makers, journalists, and other contemporary ideological snake-oil salesmen, most of whom have been driving under the same progressive influence as fecundated the fake news stories enumerated in our previous installment. Continue reading “Fake News From Long Ago” →

The Democrat Party, along with its liberal media acolytes, has been engaged in serious soul-searching of late to find out why they lost the election.  Really.

Thusfar, in roughly chronological order, they’ve come up with:  1. Whitelash.  Xenophobic, white-supremacist members of the KKK and the American Nazi Party (all fifteen members in good standing) handed the election to Trump; 2. FBI Director Comey handed the election to Trump; (3. Don’t worry.  Hillary won the popular vote.);  4. Russian “interference” in the U.S. electoral process handed the election to Trump;  5. Fake news on social media (who knew that social media was part of the vast right-wing conspiracy?) handed the election to Trump. Continue reading “Fake News” →

While Mrs. P was in the kitchen this Christmas baking her self-identified and non-binary-gendered gingerbread persons, I was wondering whether in a hundred years from now the Christmas story would have to be flagged by a trigger warning, or banned outright. Continue reading “The Christmas Story, 2116” →

You thought that war was hell; that wading through mud in the trenches for months on end, and then going over the top into the teeth of enemy fire was the worst sort of physical and psychological torture a human being could endure.  Think again. Continue reading “More Dangerous Thoughts on University Safe Zones” →

Parmenides’ Way of Truth, continued…

The Supremacy of Reason…

Being and Not-Being…

Parmenides’ Abolition of Movement, Change, and the World-Process…

Parmenides and Plato…

The Greeks’ habitual critique of sensory experience is already implicit in Heracleitus, who lamented that “eyes and ears are bad witnesses to men if they have souls that do not understand their language”.  Eyes and ears tell us that the world is multiform, but to the intellect, the “Logos is one and common to all”.  Parmenides carries the Heracleitean doctrine of the opposition between the subjectivity and particularity of experience, and the objective universality of the Logos (i.e., reason), to its inevitable conclusion.  If the rational intelligence alone can make sense of experience, then intelligence is supra-ordinate to it; and if the data of sense come into conflict with the conclusions of sovereign reason, the former must yield to the latter.

Continue reading “The Vocabulary of Myth, Part XXXIV” →

Parmenides…

His Philosophy as another Sacred Revelation…

His Rejection of Heracleitus…

His Absolute Rationalism…

For Heracleitus, the world is a one and a many.  As perceived by the senses, it is a chaotic spectacle of multiplicity, change, and decay.  As penetrated by the intellect, however, reality is eternal, immutable, and unitary.  The one, universal Logos-Fire undergoes a multiplicity of transformations under the sensible aspects of the elements, and yet, hidden beneath these superficial forms, it remains an immutable One. Continue reading “The Vocabulary of Myth, Part XXXIII” →